Re: Luke prior to Gospel of Marcion ?
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:35 am
to Ben,
1) You surmise the existence of a proto-Lukan gospel, of which we have no evidence.
2) Then you surmise that proto-Lukan gospel was about the same than gMarcion. Of course we have no evidence of that either, more so because we don't know about the make-up of your hypothetical proto-Lukan gospel.
Then, if there was a proto-Lukan gospel, which came next chronologically gLuke or gMarcion?
Cordially, Bernard
I see two problems here:The fact is, both scenarios have Marcion tolerating the Jewish stuff present in his own gospel. But for him to have cut out scads of Jewish references and tolerated the remaining ones is not measurably more likely, on its own merits, than that he simply left those bits in when he propagated a gospel text that he had inherited (in fact, it seems less likely to me, but I will not press that point here and now).
I would agree, however, that both of the above scenarios are more likely than that Marcion wrote the gospel from scratch and deliberately included those bits.
1) You surmise the existence of a proto-Lukan gospel, of which we have no evidence.
2) Then you surmise that proto-Lukan gospel was about the same than gMarcion. Of course we have no evidence of that either, more so because we don't know about the make-up of your hypothetical proto-Lukan gospel.
Then, if there was a proto-Lukan gospel, which came next chronologically gLuke or gMarcion?
Cordially, Bernard