Page 8 of 18

Re: Luke prior to Gospel of Marcion ?

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:35 am
by Bernard Muller
to Ben,
The fact is, both scenarios have Marcion tolerating the Jewish stuff present in his own gospel. But for him to have cut out scads of Jewish references and tolerated the remaining ones is not measurably more likely, on its own merits, than that he simply left those bits in when he propagated a gospel text that he had inherited (in fact, it seems less likely to me, but I will not press that point here and now).

I would agree, however, that both of the above scenarios are more likely than that Marcion wrote the gospel from scratch and deliberately included those bits.
I see two problems here:
1) You surmise the existence of a proto-Lukan gospel, of which we have no evidence.
2) Then you surmise that proto-Lukan gospel was about the same than gMarcion. Of course we have no evidence of that either, more so because we don't know about the make-up of your hypothetical proto-Lukan gospel.

Then, if there was a proto-Lukan gospel, which came next chronologically gLuke or gMarcion?

Cordially, Bernard

Re: Luke prior to Gospel of Marcion ?

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:43 am
by Bernard Muller
to Secret Alias,
Where is this passage?
I was addressing Giuseppe criticism on my views on gMarcion 6:17 "But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away, ... than one tittle of my [Jesus] words to fail."
But my following remark:
But Marcion, in his gospel, acknowledged the past existence of Jesus on earth, in a physical body and looking like a human, but not born from a woman.
can be applied to the whole of gMarcion.

Cordially, Bernard

Re: Luke prior to Gospel of Marcion ?

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:55 am
by Ben C. Smith
Bernard Muller wrote:to Ben,
The fact is, both scenarios have Marcion tolerating the Jewish stuff present in his own gospel. But for him to have cut out scads of Jewish references and tolerated the remaining ones is not measurably more likely, on its own merits, than that he simply left those bits in when he propagated a gospel text that he had inherited (in fact, it seems less likely to me, but I will not press that point here and now).
I see two problems here:
1) You surmise the existence of a proto-Lukan gospel, of which we have no evidence.
2) Then you surmise that proto-Lukan gospel was about the same than gMarcion. Of course we have no evidence of that either, more so because we don't know about the make-up of your hypothetical proto-Lukan gospel.
That is not the point, even if both items are correct (they are not, but even if). The point is that other scenarios account for the individual datum (the presence of Jewish factors in the Marcionite gospel) that you adduced. If you were importing your whole mental construct about these gospels into your statement, fine; but that was not clear. I read you as claiming that the remnant of Jewish stuff in the Marcionite text was, on its own merits, best explained your way. And it most certainly is not, not on its own merits.

Re: Luke prior to Gospel of Marcion ?

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 12:52 pm
by Secret Alias
... in a physical body
But a body that could pass through crowds (or crowds pass through) and fly.

Re: Luke prior to Gospel of Marcion ?

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:50 pm
by Bernard Muller
to Secret Alias,
But a body that could pass through crowds (or crowds pass through) and fly.
Someone can go through a crowd and still have a physical body, as long that each person in front of that someone goes aside in order to clear the way. I do not think "Luke", or Marcion, or the hypothetical author of the hypothetical proto-Lukan gospel, imagined Jesus temporarily turned into a ghost in order to go through a crowd in Nazareth.
About flying, I do not know where you got that.

Cordially, Bernard

Re: Luke prior to Gospel of Marcion ?

Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 8:59 am
by andrewcriddle
Secret Alias wrote:Well does this sound like something historical to you?
he has hated me, and he has not kept his compact with me, I will create many gods, and I will fill up the world with them completely so that he will seek who might be God, but he will not find." And she created, they say, many idols, and she named them gods, and she filled the world with them. And the name of God who is the Lord of creatures was sunk in the midst of the names of many gods, and nowhere was He being found. And his progeny were led astray by them, and they were not worshipping him, because Matter lured them all back to herself, and she did not allow any one from among them to worship him. At that time, they say, the Lord of creatures was angered because they left him and paid attention to Matter. And angrily he was throwing into Gehenna those ones who were departing from their bodies, one after another. And he threw Adam into Gehenna because of that tree. And so he was continuing to throw everyone into Gehenna, up to twenty-nine centuries.

And, they say, the Good God and Stranger, who was residing in the third heaven, saw that between these two deceivers, the Lord of creatures and Matter, so many people had been lost and tortured, and it grieved him because of their having fallen into fire and their having been tortured.

He sent his Son to redeem them and 'to take on the likeness of a slave and to come into being in the form of man' [Phil 2:7] in the midst of the sons of the God of the Law. 'Heal' he said 'their lepers and give life to their dead and open their blind and make very great healings as a gift to them, so that the Lord of creatures might see you and be jealous and raise you on a cross.'

'And then having become dead you will descend into the Harsh (or, Hell) and you will raise them thence because it is not customary for the Harsh to accept life into its midst. And for the same reason you will go up to the cross so that you might resemble the dead and so that you might open the mouth of Hell to take you and enter into the middle of it and empty it.'

And when he had raised him on a cross, they say, he descended into the Harsh and emptied it. And having raised the souls from the middle of it he led them into the third heaven, to his Father.

And the Lord of creatures having become angry, in his anger he rent his robe and the curtain of of his temple. And he darkened his sun and he clothed his world in umber. And in his affliction he dwelt in mourning. Then when Jesus descended a second time in the form of his divinity to the Lord of creatures, he brought a lawsuit against him on account of his death.

And when the Lord of the world saw that divinity of Jesus, he discovered that another God apart from himself existed. And Jesus said to him, 'I am in litigation with you, and let no one judge between us, but the laws that you wrote.'

And when they had placed the Law in the middle, Jesus said to him "Did you not write in your Law, 'Whoever will murder he will die, (cf Num 35.30 - 34)?' and 'Whoever sheds the blood of a righteous one, his blood will be shed (Gen 9:6)?'" And he said, 'Yes, I wrote."

And Jesus said to him "So give yourself into my hands, so that I might slaughter and shed your blood, because rightly am I more lawful than you, and great favors have I bestowed on your creatures." And he began to reckon up those favors that he had bestowed on that one's creatures.

And when the Lord of creatures saw that he had gained victory over him - neither did he know what to say in reply because by his own Law he was condemned; nor did he find an answer to give because he came forth condemnation in exchange for his death - so having fallen down in supplication, he was praying to him "Whereas I sinned and slaughtered you ignorantly because I did not know that you were a god, but rather I considered you a man, let there be given to you in exchange, for revenge, all of those who wish to believe in you to take wheresoever you wish."

So Jesus having released him, he carried off Paul from the astonished ones, and he revealed to him their prices, and he sent him forth to preach that we have been bought for a price, and everyone who believes in Jesus has been sold by that Just One to the Good One.

This is the beginning of the sect of the Marcion, leaving aside many irrelevancies - and what not everyone knows, but rather a few from among them, and they transmit that teaching to one another by mouth. They say, "By means of the price of the Stranger we were purchased from the Lord of creatures," and "How or in what way is the purchase, this no one knows."
This is certainly a highly imaginatively creative text and hence I suppose visionary in a certain meaning of the word.

However I thought that by visionary you meant something like a product of mystical or visionary experiences. I don't see any evidence of such experiences here. The text seems more like a poetic meditation on the Gospel narrative by someone drastically separating the Lord of Creatures from the Good God.

Andrew Criddle

Re: Luke prior to Gospel of Marcion ?

Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:15 am
by Secret Alias
Someone can go through a crowd and still have a physical body, as long that each person in front of that someone goes aside in order to clear the way. I do not think "Luke", or Marcion, or the hypothetical author of the hypothetical proto-Lukan gospel, imagined Jesus temporarily turned into a ghost in order to go through a crowd in Nazareth.
About flying, I do not know where you got that.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1584033

Re: Luke prior to Gospel of Marcion ?

Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:27 am
by Secret Alias
This is certainly a highly imaginatively creative text and hence I suppose visionary in a certain meaning of the word.
But the normal portrait of the Marcionites is that they were 'literalists' (in the same misuse of the term which supposes that the Samaritans couldn't have had halakhah). Assuming for a moment that Eznik's report is accurate (and it is generally supported by what Ephrem also reports) it's hard to square this with the Catholic Jesus 'history.'

Now with respect to your statement that most reconstructions begin with a descent to Capernaum in a particular year. Yes there does appear to be a date. Whether 15 Tybi or 15th year of Tiberius your point stands. It wasn't a myth in the classic sense where a story stands outside normal space and time. But still if Paul wrote the gospel - as the Marcionites clearly suppose he did - and Paul says that he didn't receive any tradition from men the only way to reconcile this is to assume that his trip to Paradise hearing 'unspeakable words' led to the creation of his gospel.

Even in the Letter to Theodore the 2 Cor 12:4 introduces the topic of the 'secret gospel':
You did well in silencing the unspeakable teachings of the Carpocrations ... the things they keep saying about the divinely inspired Gospel according to Mark some are altogether falsifications, and others, even if they do contain some true elements, nevertheless are not reported truly.
The same kind of attack is directed against the heresies (and the Marcionites in particular) in Tertullian Eznik and the like. There is always an attempt to transform 'words which can't be spoken' because of their holiness into 'foul mouthed' or the like when 'secret' - and 'secret gospel' developed from unspeakable utterances - is originally implied.

Re: Luke prior to Gospel of Marcion ?

Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:33 am
by andrewcriddle
Secret Alias wrote:
This is certainly a highly imaginatively creative text and hence I suppose visionary in a certain meaning of the word.
But the normal portrait of the Marcionites is that they were 'literalists' (in the same misuse of the term which supposes that the Samaritans couldn't have had halakhah). Assuming for a moment that Eznik's report is accurate (and it is generally supported by what Ephrem also reports) it's hard to square this with the Catholic Jesus 'history.'
I may be quite wrong here but IIUC when people regard the Marcionites as 'literalists' what they mean is that they avoided the drastic allegorisation of the Old Testament found in 'catholic' Christianity from Barnabas onwards. If so this is quite compatible with highly developed creative imagination.

Andrew Criddle

Re: Luke prior to Gospel of Marcion ?

Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:34 am
by Charles Wilson
Bernard Muller wrote:to Secret Alias,
But a body that could pass through crowds (or crowds pass through) and fly.
Someone can go through a crowd and still have a physical body, as long that each person in front of that someone goes aside in order to clear the way. I do not think "Luke", or Marcion, or the hypothetical author of the hypothetical proto-Lukan gospel, imagined Jesus temporarily turned into a ghost in order to go through a crowd in Nazareth.
About flying, I do not know where you got that.

Cordially, Bernard
Josephus, Wars..., 4, 1, 10:

"At which time Titus, who was now returned, out of the indignation he had at the destruction the Romans had undergone while he was absent, took two hundred chosen horsemen and some footmen with him, and entered without noise into the city. Now as the watch perceived that he was coming, they made a noise, and betook themselves to their arms; and as that his entrance was presently known to those that were in the city, some of them caught hold of their children and their wives, and drew them after them, and fled away to the citadel, with lamentations and cries, while others of them went to meet Titus, and were killed perpetually; but so many of them as were hindered from running up to the citadel, not knowing what in the world to do, fell among the Roman guards, while the groans of those that were killed were prodigiously great every where, and blood ran down over all the lower parts of the city, from the upper. But then Vespasian himself came to his assistance against those that had fled to the citadel, and brought his whole army with him; now this upper part of the city was every way rocky, and difficult of ascent, and elevated to a vast altitude, and very full of people on all sides, and encompassed with precipices, whereby the Jews cut off those that came up to them, and did much mischief to others by their darts, and the large stones which they rolled down upon them, while they were themselves so high that the enemy's darts could hardly reach them. However, there arose such a Divine storm against them as was instrumental to their destruction; this carried the Roman darts upon them, and made those which they threw return back, and drove them obliquely away from them; nor could the Jews indeed stand upon their precipices, by reason of the violence of the wind, having nothing that was stable to stand upon, nor could they see those that were ascending up to them; so the Romans got up and surrounded them, and some they slew before they could defend themselves, and others as they were delivering up themselves; and the remembrance of those that were slain at their former entrance into the city increased their rage against them now; a great number also of those that were surrounded on every side, and despaired of escaping, threw their children and their wives, and themselves also, down the precipices, into the valley beneath, which, near the citadel, had been dug hollow to a vast depth; but so it happened, that the anger of the Romans appeared not to be so extravagant as was the madness of those that were now taken, while the Romans slew but four thousand, whereas the number of those that had thrown themselves down was found to be five thousand..."

Before you go "Somewhere Over the Rainbow", at least look to see if there is another explanation.

CW