Page 5 of 23
Re: IS THE PROTO-LUKE HYPOTHESIS SOUND?
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:10 pm
by Secret Alias
Consider Irenaeus's early use of the term 'Christian' in Adv Marc 1.25.6 "They declare that they are no longer Jews, and that they are not yet Christians." Who was responsible for this term?
Re: No
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:18 pm
by MrMacSon
JoeWallack wrote:Christian Bible Scholarship (CBS) continues to be in denial that GMark has a primary theme of discrediting the supposed original disciples. All subsequent Gospels attempt to undo this theme (which is evidence that GMark is the original Gospel narrative). Looking at supposed "proto-Luke" material, this is obvious:
10 10:1 Now after these things the Lord appointed seventy others, and sent them two and two before his face into every city and place, whither he himself was about to come.
The discrediting of "The Twelve" in GMark is overwhelming. It is the most important theme in GMark. So all subsequent Gospels, which all appear to have the opposite objective, crediting the original disciples,
must deal with it. GLuke shows a logical later development that GLuke's Jesus expanded (greatly) Jesus' disciples. In quantity and quality. This reduces the problem of the base theme that GLuke inherited, discrediting of the original twelve. This is not evidence of "proto-Luke", it is evidence of post GMark.
Kunigunde Kreuzerin wrote:
Agreed. My impression is that Luke shifted Mark’s broader theme of “the misunderstanding of the disciples” to the problem of the passion, the death and the resurrection of Jesus, but with the resurrection “everything” has become well in GLuke. I think this was very clever from Luke. Then Acts, then Irenaeus ...
Against Heresies, Book III, 1.1
1. WE have learned from none others the plan of our salvation, than from those through whom the Gospel has come down to us, which they did at one time proclaim in public, and, at a later period, by the will of God, handed down to us in the Scriptures, to be the ground and pillar of our faith. For it is unlawful to assert that they preached before they possessed "perfect knowledge", as some do even venture to say, boasting themselves as improvers of the apostles. For, after our Lord rose from the dead, [the apostles] were invested with power from on high when the Holy Spirit came down [upon them], were filled from all [His gifts], and had perfect knowledge: they departed to the ends of the earth, preaching the glad tidings of the good things [sent] from God to us, and proclaiming the peace of heaven to men, who indeed do all equally and individually possess the Gospel of God.
Thank you!
lol ' boasting themselves as
improvers of the apostles'
...
yet, "We have learned from
...those through whom the Gospel has 'come down to us', which they did at one time proclaim in public ...
handed down to us in the Scriptures, to be the ground and pillar of our faith."
yet, concern that '.. they [had] preached before they possessed "perfect knowledge".. '
... 
Re: IS THE PROTO-LUKE HYPOTHESIS SOUND?
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:23 pm
by Secret Alias
There is so little Greek available for Irenaeus that it is hard to determine the extent of his Latinisms but Epiphanius does preserve the Greek here. But the names are Latinized Σιμωνιανοὶ Μενανδριανοὶ Σατορνιλιανοὶ Βασιλειδιανοὶ. Surely Irenaeus the originator of 'heresiology' was responsible for the Latinized technical language.
Re: IS THE PROTO-LUKE HYPOTHESIS SOUND?
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:46 pm
by Secret Alias
The term 'Gnostic' (Γνωστικοὺς) seems to be the name given to the heresies by Irenaeus. Odd name.
Re: IS THE PROTO-LUKE HYPOTHESIS SOUND?
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:15 pm
by Secret Alias
I found an accessible text of what is available of Irenaeus in Greek -
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... clnk&gl=us
Re: IS THE PROTO-LUKE HYPOTHESIS SOUND?
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:54 pm
by Secret Alias
And in a matter of moments I found a Latinism in Irenaeus:
And since the twelfth Aeon, when it rebelled, deserted the eleven (letters) before it, they say that the form of the (two) letters (found in the letter mu) is parallel to the shape of the lamda—for lambda, that is the number thirty, is the eleventh letter—and that its place in the alphabet reflects the dispensation (mentioned) above
καὶ ἐπεὶ ὁ δωδέκατος Αἰὼν ἀποστὰς κατέλειψε τοὺς ἄνω ἕνδεκα, κατάλληλον λέγουσι τὸν τύπον τῶν γραμμάτων τῷ σχήματι τοῦ
λόγου κεῖσθαι ἑνδέκατον γὰρ τῶν γραμμάτων κεῖται τὸ λ, ὅ ἐστιν ἀριθμὸς τῶν τριάκοντα καὶ κατ' εἰκόνα κεῖσθαι τῆς ἄνω οἰκονομίας, ἐπειδὴ ἀπὸ τοῦ ἄλφα,
Re: IS THE PROTO-LUKE HYPOTHESIS SOUND?
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:57 pm
by Secret Alias
And why does Irenaeus need to explain to a Greek audience that lamda is the number 30. The text was written in Latin. This is such bullshit. What kind of Greek wasn't aware that lamba was the number thirty? The reason we just go along with the lesson is because Greek calculations were as alien to us as for Latins. But just think of this text. It couldn't have been written for Greek speakers unless his audience was six year olds.
Re: IS THE PROTO-LUKE HYPOTHESIS SOUND?
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 3:02 pm
by Secret Alias
The Latin in this section is:
undecimam enim in literis esse λ, qui est numerus xxx
Re: IS THE PROTO-LUKE HYPOTHESIS SOUND?
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 3:11 pm
by Secret Alias
The same Latinism happens earlier in the treatise:
Next, Eta being added to these, that is eight, the most wonderful Triacontad is completed (το η, ο εστιν οκτὼ, την θαυμασιωτατην τριακονταδα).
The Latin here is:
Quum autem appositum est eis H, quod est octavum, admirabilem triacontadem adimplevit.
Re: IS THE PROTO-LUKE HYPOTHESIS SOUND?
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 3:14 pm
by Secret Alias
This Latinism appears in Mark:
καὶ Ἰάκωβον τὸν τοῦ Ζεβεδαίου καὶ Ἰωάννην τὸν ἀδελφὸν τοῦ Ἰακώβου, καὶ ἐπέθηκεν αὐτοῖς ὀνόματα Βοανηργές, ὅ ἐστιν Υἱοὶ Βροντῆς (Mark 3:17)