outhouse wrote:Michael BG wrote:You arrear to be accepting that some praying went on at synagogues
I have already stated you took me out of context,
I am glad we have cleared this up now.
outhouse wrote:I stated Christians and Jews were not likely to pray together.
I am glad you seem to have moderated your position.
Michael BG wrote:
We know from Galatians (2:11-13) that there is something called the “circumcision party”, who are Jewish Christians like Peter, James and Barnabas. Paul is fighting a requirement to live like Jews at Antioch. This means that members of the “circumcision party” lived as Jews along-side Jews who were not Christians. It is clear from Galatians that they (the Galatian Christians) were living according to the Law as Jews. In 1 Corinthians (8:7ff) there are still some Christians at Corinth who will not eat food offered to idols.
I note you have not provided a coherent argument against the idea that there were circumcised Jews within the Christian community at Antioch and within Galatia and possibly at Corinth. Also we know the names of some of these Christians – Peter, James, John and Barnabas.
outhouse wrote:I have also shown from acts Paul was beaten and almost killed for going to synagogues.
You have NOT done so. You listed one Acts reference - Acts 13:15: which states
After the reading of the law and the prophets, the rulers of the synagogue sent to them, saying, "Brethren, if you have any word of exhortation for the people, say it."
I can’t see this as a referring to Paul being beaten!
At Pisidian Antioch Paul and Barnabas were driven out of the area by women (13:50).
According to the Acts Seminar “the recurring theme of organized Jewish persecution. These characteristics mark the story as Luke’s creation” (p 155).
Do you think that Paul taught in synagogues?
outhouse wrote:My context was Christians were not praying with Jews in synagogues, and I have already stated this 5 replies ago. Yet you fail to comprehend
I comprehended that you have asserted that no Christians prayed with Jews in synagogues. But as usual you provided no evidence. I have provided evidence that circumcised Jews were Christians and therefore it follows that they prayed together. You accepted that Christians did attend synagogues with your long list of references earlier.
outhouse wrote:The current academic and scholarly consensus is that Jewish Christians did exist,
I am glad you have accepted that my position is the consensus one thereby putting the onus on you to provide a coherent case against the consensus.
outhouse wrote:From the very beginning in the first years of the movement they were hunted down by Jews, as Paul was hired to do. The SHARP division between the two groups started from the very beginning.
Paul was not hunted down by Jews. Peter, Apollos and Barnabas were not hunted down by Jews.
Today I was reading “Comparing Paul and Luke on Paul’s conversion” by Thomas E Phillips in Acts and Christian Beginnings where he states that Gal 1:13 should be translated as “how aggressively I harassed” rather than “violently persecuted” (p 115). It could be translated as “I pursued the assembly and harassed it”.
In Acts there is no sharp division, Peter is going to the Temple often.
outhouse wrote:This movement WAS NOT founded on Jesus real followers spreading Jesus theology. It was founded on Diaspora Proselytes who started with mythology and theology that grew at Passover based on the Martyrdom surrounding Jesus death. The theology started and stayed in Hellenism. and because a trouble making Zealot type rebel was their founder these people were perceived as a threat in Israel and the Diaspora where Paul hunted these people down.
Can you make a case that Peter and John were not followers of Jesus during his lifetime. I am really interested in reading it.
Paul and Barnabas were Jews. I think Apollos was a Jew too.
outhouse wrote:CHRISTIANS had to hide in houses from the very beginning. Not make themselves known. They were not accepted by Jews from the very beginning.
I don’t think this is true, but why don’t you try to convince me it is? You know with a coherently argued case.