Page 2 of 2

Re: Papyrus 131

Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:12 pm
by Stuart
andrewcriddle wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:22 am
Stuart wrote: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:36 pm 200 CE is an optimistic date for P46. But it doesn't much effect dating anything.

Almost all the dates given are the earlier end of the range these documents could be. That should be drilled into people. But for some reason everyone just accepts the earliest possible date, rather than mention the range, which in many cases is a century later or more.
FWIW there has been a serious attempt to date P46 c 100 CE

See http://www.friktech.com/rel/p46.htm

Andrew Criddle
LOL, bible in one hand, dating method in the other. What a joke.