Page 22 of 33

Re: Loaves and Fishes

Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 12:37 pm
by neilgodfrey
Mental flatliner wrote:That's why we got the song, "Age of Acquarius" in the 60s, decades before the exact date of the new age.
God you still blab ignorance even when you're not talking about the Bible. The "Dawning of the Age of Aquarius" was well understood at the time to precede the astronomical change-over point of time. That's why it was said to be the Dawning of the Age, not the Age.

Re: Loaves and Fishes

Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 12:46 pm
by Mental flatliner
neilgodfrey wrote:
Mental flatliner wrote:That's why we got the song, "Age of Acquarius" in the 60s, decades before the exact date of the new age.
God you still blab ignorance even when you're not talking about the Bible. The "Dawning of the Age of Aquarius" was well understood at the time to precede the astronomical change-over point of time. That's why it was said to be the Dawning of the Age, not the Age.
Have you ever wondered why you're not considered ignorant until after you post?

I made no statement about the way the song was received.

I made a statement about the voice of the astronomer being drowned out by pop culture, and the fact that, looking back 2000 years to Jesus' ministry, the pop culture may be all we can see as a result.

Interpreting history through the eyes of pop culture is therefore problematic and rarely if ever useful in precise dating.

Re: Loaves and Fishes

Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 1:10 pm
by The Crow
Mental flatliner wrote:
neilgodfrey wrote:
Mental flatliner wrote:That's why we got the song, "Age of Acquarius" in the 60s, decades before the exact date of the new age.
God you still blab ignorance even when you're not talking about the Bible. The "Dawning of the Age of Aquarius" was well understood at the time to precede the astronomical change-over point of time. That's why it was said to be the Dawning of the Age, not the Age.
Have you ever wondered why you're not considered ignorant until after you post?

I made no statement about the way the song was received.

I made a statement about the voice of the astronomer being drowned out by pop culture, and the fact that, looking back 2000 years to Jesus' ministry, the pop culture may be all we can see as a result.

Interpreting history through the eyes of pop culture is therefore problematic and rarely if ever useful in precise dating.
Mark 14:13 And He sent forth two of His disciples and said unto them, “Go ye into the city, and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water; follow him.

Reading your post the last few days I am sure you are not going to buy this but I thought what the hell.

Re: Loaves and Fishes

Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 1:19 pm
by Stephan Huller
Via Joel Watts
Image

Re: Loaves and Fishes

Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 5:45 pm
by Mental flatliner
The Crow wrote: Mark 14:13 And He sent forth two of His disciples and said unto them, “Go ye into the city, and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water; follow him.

Reading your post the last few days I am sure you are not going to buy this but I thought what the hell.
Yeah...

Re: Loaves and Fishes

Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 6:52 pm
by Stephan Huller
Image

Re: Loaves and Fishes

Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 6:53 pm
by Stephan Huller
Image

Re: Loaves and Fishes

Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 6:54 pm
by Stephan Huller
Image

Re: Loaves and Fishes

Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 6:59 pm
by Stephan Huller
ImageImageImageImageImageImage

Re: Loaves and Fishes

Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 8:57 pm
by Stephan Huller
ImageImageImage
17th century

Image