The end of short Mark leads to ...

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
User avatar
neilgodfrey
Posts: 6162
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:08 pm

Re: The end of short Mark leads to ...

Post by neilgodfrey »

lsayre wrote: Mon Apr 11, 2022 1:21 am If there was a tomb that had it's stone rolled away, and some women found it and then ran away and told no one, did the lives of all of those 'not told' end at that moment, or did they live on for decades whereby to eventually get around to seeing the opened and now empty tomb for themselves? It all has the ring of story telling and nothing more.
Or as William Wrede said of another episode in the Gospel of Mark,
In short, in this description of the situation Mark is approximating to the style of the fairy-tale.
Wrede, William. The Messianic Secret: Das Messiasgeheimnis in Den Evangelien. Translated by J. C. G. Greig. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co., 1971. p. 142
User avatar
mlinssen
Posts: 3431
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:01 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

The unexpected revival of the hero in SE 2 EP 1

Post by mlinssen »

lsayre wrote: Mon Apr 11, 2022 1:21 am If there was a tomb that had it's stone rolled away, and some women found it and then ran away and told no one, did the lives of all of those 'not told' end at that moment, or did they live on for decades whereby to eventually get around to seeing the opened and now empty tomb for themselves? It all has the ring of story telling and nothing more.
It all entirely is story telling, lsayre. There are countless examples these days of where a hero has died in a previous Season yet magically turns up in a next - and what Mark is doing here is basically exactly the same.
It just is so painfully obvious because this revived hero is an entirely purposeless one as he does "fuck all" as the Brits say - he makes it so absolutely, entirely, blantantly obviously clear that his entire purpose is only to be revived that I'm surprised that I didn't see it before

What's the sole use in Jesus resurrecting from the dead? To fulfil his own prophecy, period.
What does he do next? Fuck all
How would any of that benefit Marcion? Nowt
User avatar
MrMacSon
Posts: 8916
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: The end of short Mark leads to ...

Post by MrMacSon »

fwiw, the Original Post
MrMacSon wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2020 7:22 pm
Mark 16:5-8


5 As they entered the tomb, they saw a young man dressed in a white robe sitting on the right side, and they were alarmed.

6 “Don’t be alarmed,” he said. “You are looking for Jesus 'the Nazarene', who was crucified. He has risen! He is not here. See the place where they laid him. 7 But go, tell his disciples and Peter, ‘He is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him, just as he told you.’”

8 ...


It's almost as if this would encourage people to reflect on or even begin to reading the beginning of Mark - chapter 1 - again, which is, -


1 The beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God, 2 as it is written in Isaiah the prophet:

I will send my messenger ahead of you,
who will prepare your way”—

3 “a voice of one calling in the wilderness,
‘Prepare the way for the Lord,
make straight paths for him’.


4 And so John the Baptist appeared in the wilderness ...

7 And this was his message: “After me comes the one more powerful than I .. he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.”

9 In those days Jesus came from Nazareth in Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan. 10 Just as Jesus was coming up out of the water, he saw heaven being torn open and the Spirit descending on him like a dove. 11 And a voice came from heaven: “You are my Son, whom I love; with you I am well pleased.”

12 And the Spirit immediately drove him out into the wilderness [see v.3^] . 13 He was in the wilderness forty days, tempted by Satan; and he was with the wild beasts; and the angels waited on him.

14 Now after John was arrested, Jesus came to Galilee, proclaiming the good news of God, 15 and saying, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God has come near; repent, and believe in the good news.”


... Could the 'young man dressed in a white robe sitting on the right side', in Mark 16.5, have been a reflection of or a hat-tip to John the Baptist?

It's about the circularity of the text ... the end seems to direct to the beginning (the ? about the young man aside)
User avatar
mlinssen
Posts: 3431
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:01 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The end of short Mark leads to ...

Post by mlinssen »

MrMacSon wrote: Mon Apr 11, 2022 4:26 am fwiw, the Original Post
It's about the circularity of the text ... the end seems to direct to the beginning (the ? about the young man aside)
I like that idea - at the end there is no more Jesus just as in the very beginning there is no Jesus?
User avatar
MrMacSon
Posts: 8916
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: The end of short Mark leads to ...

Post by MrMacSon »

There's a Jesus in the gospel-story, but if Mark 1:1 —> Mark 16:7 —> Mark 1:1 —> Mark 16:7, it's circular and that lends itself to (i) being reinforcing and (ii) to being modified or added to, though of course it's easy to say that b/c that's almost certainly what happened eg. (1) Mark 16:9-20 (and the occasional extra verse between v.8 and v.9 noted in the OP), and (2) the *Ev/Luke (and Matthew):

Both BeDuhn and Klinghardt (in his 2018 book, at least) have, in each and both their versions of *Ev, unnamed women return to the tomb and have two men in there, in shining/dazzling clothes, who say to the women, "Why are you looking for the living among the dead? Remember when he spoke to you [(a)a/(b)b] [saying] it is necessary that the Human Beinga/Son of Manb be handed over and be stakeda/crucifiedb and awakena/riseb on the third day"

a BeDuhn, The First New Testament, 2013. (a) = "in Galilee"

b Klinghardt, The Oldest Gospel, 2018. (b) = "when he was still with you"

Both BeDuhn and Klinghardt have the two women return to tell others in contrast to Mark 16:8 -

BeDuhn has them telling "all these things" to 'the pupils'"; [ single quotation marks added by me]

Klinghardt has them telling "all of this to the {apostles} and to all the others, Mary Magdalene and Joanna and Mary (the wife) of James." (sic)

They weren't believed, of course.

and BeDuhn and Klinghardt have Jesus in their *Evs then appearing to Cleopas alone (BeDuhn) or "Emmaus {and Cleopas}" (Klinghardt) who did not recognize him for a while, until they received bread from him ...
Last edited by MrMacSon on Mon Apr 11, 2022 4:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mlinssen
Posts: 3431
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:01 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The end of short Mark leads to ...

Post by mlinssen »

MrMacSon wrote: Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:19 am There's a Jesus in the gospel-story, but if Mark 1:1 —> Mark 16:7 —> Mark 1:1 —> Mark 16:7, it's circular and that lends itself to (i) being reinforcing and (ii) to being modified or added to, though of course it's easy to say that b/c that's almost certainly what happened eg. (1) Mark 16:9-20 (and the occasional extra verse between v.8 and v.9 noted in the OP), and (2) the *Ev:

Both BeDuhn and Klinghardt (in his 2018 book, at least) have, in each and both their versions of *Ev, unnamed women return to the tomb and have two men in there, in shining/dazzling clothes, who say to the women, "Why are you looking for the living among the dead? Remember when he spoke to you [(a)a/(b)b] [saying] it is necessary that the Human Beinga/Son of Manb be handed over and be stakeda/crucifiedb and awakena/riseb on the third day"

a BeDuhn, The First New Testament, 2013. (a) = "in Galilee"

b Klinghardt, The Oldest Gospel, 2018. (b) = "when he was still with you"

Both BeDuhn and Klinghardt have the two women return to tell others in contrast to Mark 16:8 -

BeDuhn has them telling "all these things" to 'the pupils'"; [ single quotation marks added by me]

Klinghardt has them telling "all of this to the {apostles} and to all the others, Mary Magdalene and Joanna and Mary (the wife) of James." (sic)

They weren't believed, of course.

and BeDuhn and Klinghardt have Jesus in their *Evs then appearing to Cleopas alone (BeDuhn) or "Emmaus {and Cleopas}" (Klinghardt) who did not recognize him for a while, until they received bread from him ...
Yes, they do, hence my disclaimer on page 5

I follow Klinghardt’s reconstruction, as well as Vinzent’s great use of that in his Christi Thora, yet deviate from it at two points:

1) *Ev highly likely did not contain the Tiberius dating “In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar, when Pilate was governing Judea”: there is ample attestation to it but there’s quite a lot of it really. It serves no purpose to Marcion whereas its benefits to Christianity are undeniably essential
2) *Ev highly likely did not contain a resurrection - and that is pivotal and it will be discussed in the next chapter, and it will serve as the working thesis for it

No one who's read the FF will say that it's a good idea to always trust what they say, but Mark is not even in their writings. Yet needless to say they are determined to tell the story as they want it told, just as Mark was

Perhaps I can best summarise my take as follows: I don't trust everything the FF say.
How could you best summarise your take?
User avatar
MrMacSon
Posts: 8916
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: The end of short Mark leads to ...

Post by MrMacSon »

MrMacSon wrote: Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:19 am
There's a Jesus in the gospel-story, but if Mark 1:1 —> Mark 16:7 —> Mark 1:1 —> Mark 16:7, it's circular and that lends itself to (i) being reinforcing and (ii) to being modified or added to, though of course it's easy to say that b/c that's almost certainly what happened eg. (1) Mark 16:9-20 (and the occasional extra verse between v.8 and v.9 noted in the OP), and (2) the *Ev:

Both BeDuhn and Klinghardt (in his 2018 book, at least) have, in each and both their versions of *Ev, unnamed women return to the tomb and have two men in there, in shining/dazzling clothes, who say to the women, "Why are you looking for the living among the dead? Remember when he spoke to you [(a)a/(b)b] [saying] it is necessary that the Human Beinga/Son of Manb be handed over and be stakeda/crucifiedb and awakena/riseb on the third day"

a BeDuhn, The First New Testament, 2013. (a) = "in Galilee"

b Klinghardt, The Oldest Gospel, 2018. (b) = "when he was still with you"

Both BeDuhn and Klinghardt have the two women return to tell others in contrast to Mark 16:8 -

BeDuhn has them telling "all these things" to 'the pupils'"; [ single quotation marks added by me]

Klinghardt has them telling "all of this to the {apostles} and to all the others, Mary Magdalene and Joanna and Mary (the wife) of James." (sic)

They weren't believed, of course.

and BeDuhn and Klinghardt have Jesus in their *Evs then appearing to Cleopas alone (BeDuhn) or "Emmaus {and Cleopas}" (Klinghardt) who did not recognize him for a while, until they received bread from him ...


Most of what DeDuhn and Klinghardt recount is in 'our' Luke 24, although there, ie. in Luke 24:13, Emmaus is a village

Luke 24 (the final chapter in Luke)


13 Now that same day two of them [two of the apostles most likely] were going to a village called Emmaus, about seven miles from Jerusalem. 14 They were talking with each other about everything that had happened. 15 As they talked and discussed these things with each other, Jesus himself came up and walked along with them; 16 but they were kept from recognizing him.

17 He asked them, “What are you discussing together as you walk along?”

They stood still, their faces downcast. 18 One of them, named Cleopas, asked him, “Are you the only one visiting Jerusalem who does not know the things that have happened there in these days?”

19 “What things?” he asked.

“About Jesus of Nazareth,” they replied. “He was a prophet, powerful in word and deed before God and all the people. 20 The chief priests and our rulers handed him over to be sentenced to death, and they crucified him; 21 but we had hoped that he was the one who was going to redeem Israel. And what is more, it is the third day since all this took place. 22 In addition, some of our women amazed us. They went to the tomb early this morning 23 but didn’t find his body. They came and told us that they had seen a vision of angels, who said he was alive. 24 Then some of our companions went to the tomb and found it just as the women had said, but they did not see Jesus.”

25 He said to them, “How foolish you are, and how slow to believe all that the prophets have spoken! 26 Did not the Messiah have to suffer these things and then enter his glory?” 27 And, beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself.

28 As they approached the village to which they were going, Jesus continued on as if he were going farther. 29 But they urged him strongly, “Stay with us, for it is nearly evening; the day is almost over.” So he went in to stay with them.

30 When he was at the table with them, he took bread, gave thanks, broke it and began to give it to them. 31 Then their eyes were opened and they recognized him, [yet] he disappeared from their sight. 32 They asked each other, “Were not our hearts burning within us while he talked with us on the road and opened the Scriptures to us?”

33 They got up and returned at once to Jerusalem. There they found the Eleven and those with them, assembled together 34 and saying, “It is true! The Lord has risen and has appeared to Simon.” 35 Then the two told what had happened on the way, and how Jesus was recognized by them when he broke the bread.


Huh? Why does Simon get specified here? Where does he come from?

eta: Simon 'of Cyrene' who was co-opted to carry the cross (Lk 23:16)? Why is he the one chosen for this revelation?



36 While they were still talking about this, Jesus himself stood among them and said to them, “Peace be with you.”

37 They were startled and frightened, thinking they saw a ghost. 38 He said to them, “Why are you troubled, and why do doubts rise in your minds? 39 Look at my hands and my feet. It is I myself! Touch me and see; a ghost does not have flesh and bones, as you see I have.”

40 When he had said this, he showed them his hands and feet. 41 And while they still did not believe it because of joy and amazement, he asked them, “Do you have anything here to eat?” 42 They gave him a piece of broiled fish, 43 and he took it and ate it in their presence.

44 He said to them, “This is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms.”

45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures. 46 He told them, “This is what is written: The Messiah will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day, 47 and repentance for the forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. 48 You are witnesses of these things. 49 I am going to send you what my Father has promised; but stay in the city until you have been clothed with power from on high.”

50 When he had led them out to the vicinity of Bethany, he lifted up his hands and blessed them. 51 While he was blessing them, he left them and was taken up into heaven. 52 Then they worshiped him and returned to Jerusalem with great joy. 53 And they stayed continually at the temple, praising God.


Again, a revelation associated with food, in this case fish, which he ate: v.30 only has Jesus breaking and giving them bread.

Again, references to the Judaic scriptures.

An elaboration on Mark ... as is Matthew ...
Last edited by MrMacSon on Mon Apr 11, 2022 4:39 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
MrMacSon
Posts: 8916
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: The end of short Mark leads to ...

Post by MrMacSon »

The final chapter in G.Matthew starts with the two woman named (whereas *Ev/Luke have two unnamed women telling a group that includes women with these same names)

Matthew 27


After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb.

2 There was a violent earthquake, for an angel of the Lord came down from heaven and, going to the tomb, rolled back the stone and sat on it. 3 His appearance was like lightning, and his clothes were white as snow. 4 The guards were so afraid of him that they shook and became like dead men.

5 The angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. 6 He is not here; he has risen, just as he said. Come and see the place where he lay. 7 Then go quickly and tell his disciples: ‘He has risen from the dead and is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him.’ Now I have told you.”

8 So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples. 9 Suddenly Jesus met them. “Greetings,” he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. 10 Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”

11 While the women were on their way, some of the guards went into the city and reported to the chief priests everything that had happened. 12 When the chief priests had met with the elders and devised a plan, they gave the soldiers a large sum of money, 13 telling them, “You are to say, ‘His disciples came during the night and stole him away while we were asleep.’ 14 If this report gets to the governor, we will satisfy him and keep you out of trouble.” 15 So the soldiers took the money and did as they were instructed. And this story has been widely circulated among the Jews to this very day [lol].

16 Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go.1 17 When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted. 18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”


to Galilee

1 to the big hill where Nazareth is ?
Last edited by MrMacSon on Mon Apr 11, 2022 4:41 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
MrMacSon
Posts: 8916
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: The end of short Mark leads to ...

Post by MrMacSon »

mlinssen wrote: Mon Apr 11, 2022 7:40 am How could you best summarise your take?
There were likely a variety of accounts of *Ev/proto-Mark among a variety of interested peoples. The post Marcion/post Justin FFs as you call them were representing the Lukan view, but there were clearly different views at that time.
User avatar
MrMacSon
Posts: 8916
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: The end of short Mark leads to ...

Post by MrMacSon »

MrMacSon wrote: Mon Apr 11, 2022 3:26 pm
Luke 24 (the final chapter in Luke)

33 They got up and returned at once to Jerusalem. There they found the Eleven and those with them, assembled together 34 and saying, “It is true! The Lord has risen and has appeared to Simon.” 35 Then the two told what had happened on the way, and how Jesus was recognized by them when he broke the bread.

Huh? Why does Simon get specified here? Where does he come from?

eta: Simon 'of Cyrene' who was co-opted to carry the cross (Lk 23:16)? Why is he the one chosen for this revelation?


Perhaps the answer is in a link ML provided here viewtopic.php?p=135677#p135677

ie. https://logeion.uchicago.edu/Σίμων


Parsed as a form of: Σίμων, Σῖμος
See Σίμων in Μορφώ

Σίμων

Short Definition
Σίμων, Simon; one of the Telchines; prov., a confederate in evil
_________________

Σίμων [ῐ], ωνος, ὁ,

Simon, one of the Telchines (v. Τελχίν), used prov. of a confederate in evil, οἶδα Σίμωνα καὶ Σ. ἐμέ Zen. 5.41.

....II name of a throw of the dice, Eub. 57.


From Wikipedia
In Greek mythology, the Telchines (Ancient Greek: Τελχῖνες, Telkhines) were the original inhabitants of the island of Rhodes and were known in Crete and Cyprus. Their parents were either Pontus and Gaia or Tartarus and Nemesis or else they were born from the blood of castrated Uranus, along with the Erinyes. In another story, there were nine Telchines, children of Thalassa and Pontus; they had flippers instead of hands and the heads of dogs and were known as fish children. In some accounts, Poseidon was described as the Telchines' father.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telchines

eta:
In Greek mythology, Pontus (/ˈpɒntəs/; Greek: Πόντος, translit. Póntos, lit. "Sea") was an ancient, pre-Olympian sea-god, one of the Greek primordial deities. Pontus was Gaia's son and has no father; according to the Greek poet Hesiod, he was born without coupling
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontus_(mythology)
Post Reply