Jesus from Outer Space

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Bernard Muller
Posts: 3964
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 6:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Jesus from Outer Space

Post by Bernard Muller »

to GakuseiDon,
If the author of Acts had read Paul's letters, then I would have assumed that the author read an earthly meaning into "rulers of this age".
I think not. Certainly not Romans, 1&2 Corinthians & Galatians.
Perhaps it changed from the cosmic meaning in Paul to an earthly one by the time of Acts.
Paul had no cosmic meaning for the archontes in 1 Co 2:6-8.
Did you follow my debate with Giuseppe where I exposed his so-called evidence as not existing and sometimes just possibilities?
On the other hand, both seem to be consistent with rulers being earthly ones.
Certainly the author of Acts did not have any problem about having archontes as earthly human ruler.
gLuke, gMatthew, gJohn and other NT texts also have archontes as human rulers. And in these texts, demons of the "devil one", Satan or Be-el'zebul are never said to be Archontes.

Cordially, Bernard
User avatar
Ben C. Smith
Posts: 8994
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:18 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Jesus from Outer Space

Post by Ben C. Smith »

GakuseiDon wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2020 5:10 pm
Bernard Muller wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:15 amBut the same can be true if these archontes are Romans and chief priests.
The author of the Acts of the Apostles seems to think the same:

Acts 3.15 And killed the Prince of life, whom God hath raised from the dead; whereof we are witnesses.
16. And his name through faith in his name hath made this man strong, whom ye see and know: yea, the faith which is by him hath given him this perfect soundness in the presence of you all.
17. And now, brethren, I wot that through ignorance ye did it, as did also your rulers [archōn].
...
Acts 4.8. Then Peter, filled with the Holy Ghost, said unto them, Ye rulers [archōn] of the people, and elders of Israel,
9. If we this day be examined of the good deed done to the impotent man, by what means he is made whole;
10. Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, [highlight]whom ye crucified[/highlight]
...
24. And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, Lord, thou art God, which hast made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all that in them is:
25. Who by the mouth of thy servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things?
26. The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers [archōn] were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ.
27. For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together,
28. For to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done.

If the author of Acts had read Paul's letters, then I would have assumed that the author read an earthly meaning into "rulers of this age". Perhaps it changed from the cosmic meaning in Paul to an earthly one by the time of Acts. On the other hand, both seem to be consistent with rulers being earthly ones.
Another of the same ilk:

Acts 13.27: 27 “For those who live in Jerusalem, and their rulers [οἱ ἄρχοντες αὐτῶν], recognizing neither Him nor the declarations of the prophets which are read every Sabbath, fulfilled these by condemning Him.”

1 Corinthians 2.6-10: 6 Yet we do speak wisdom among those who are mature; a wisdom, however, not of this age nor of the rulers of this age, who are passing away; 7 but we speak God’s wisdom in a mystery, the hidden wisdom which God predestined before the ages to our glory; 8 the wisdom which none of the rulers of this age has understood; for if they had understood it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory; 9 but just as it is written: “Things which eye has not seen and ear has not heard, and which have not entered the human heart, all that God has prepared for those who love Him.”

Given your previous pointing out of the possible connection to Psalm 2.1, GDon, I thought you might be interested in the following possible parallels, too, the first of which (from Baruch) is found explicitly in a wisdom context, and all of which offer the same "where is"/"where are" rhetorical structure as Paul has:

Baruch 3.14-19:

14 Learn where there is wisdom,
where there is strength,
where there is understanding,
that you may at the same time discern
where there is length of days, and life,
where there is light for the eyes, and peace.
15 Who has found her place?
And who has entered her storehouses?
16 Where are the rulers of the nations [οἱ ἄρχοντες τῶν ἐθνῶν],
and those who rule over the beasts on earth;
17 those who have sport with the birds of the air,
and who hoard up silver and gold,
in which men trust,
and there is no end to their getting;
18 those who scheme to get silver, and are anxious,
whose labors are beyond measure?
19 They have vanished and gone down to Hades,
and others have arisen in their place.

Isaiah 19.11-13:

11 The officials of Zoan are mere fools;
the advice of Pharaoh’s wisest advisers has become stupid.
How can you say to Pharaoh,
“I am a son of the wise, a son of ancient kings?”
12 Well, then, where are your wise men?
Please let them tell you
and let them understand what the Lord of armies
has planned against Egypt.
13 The rulers [οἱ ἄρχοντες] of Zoan have turned out to be fools;
The rulers [οἱ ἄρχοντες] of Memphis are deluded;
Those who are the cornerstone of her tribes
Have led Egypt astray.

Isaiah 33.18:

18 Your heart will meditate on terror:
Where is one who counts [OG ποῦ εἰσιν οἱ γραμματικοί, where are the scribes]?
Where is one who weighs?
Where is one who counts the towers?”

Jeremiah 9.12: 12 Who is the wise person who may understand this? And who is he to whom the mouth of the Lord has spoken, that he may declare it? Why is the land destroyed, laid waste like the desert, so that no one passes through? / 12 τίς ὁ ἄνθρωπος ὁ συνετός, καὶ συνέτω τοῦτο· καὶ ᾧ λόγος στόματος Κυρίου πρὸς αὐτόν, ἀναγγειλάτω ὑμῖν ἕνεκεν τίνος ἀπώλετο ἡ γῆ· ἀνήφθη ὡς ἔρημος παρὰ τὸ μὴ διοδεύεσθαι αὐτήν.

Interestingly, the Syriac translation has "rulers of the age" (דעלמא = age) at Baruch 3.16 instead of "rulers of the nations." Such a change might be viewed as a widening of the scope to include Jewish rulers, since "rulers of the nations" = "rulers of the gentiles," thereby implicitly excluding the rulers of the Jewish nation from consideration.
davidmartin
Posts: 1695
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2019 2:51 pm

Re: Jesus from Outer Space

Post by davidmartin »

Bernard how do you explain this then?
"For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms"
that could have been written by Giuseppe himself lol

when Paul talks about paying homage to rulers that's him being inconsistent which he is, i'm surprised your taking Giuseppe to task over this matter which is fairly well embedded in early Christian thought in varying extremes sure, but there. you're doing it the hard way it seems to me!
User avatar
Giuseppe
Posts: 15335
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Re: Jesus from Outer Space

Post by Giuseppe »

To Bernard & GakuseiDon

the evidence that "age" is the period of time from creation until to present times is the following:
  • 1) if the Archontes were earthly authorities, then their "wisdom" would be one and the same of the "wisdom of this age".
  • 2) But the Apostle distinguishes betwen the wisdom "of the archontes of this age" and the wisdom "of this age" as two separate wisdoms:

    We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age, nor [οὐδὲ] of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.

    (1 Corinthians 2:6)

    The presence of οὐδὲ prevents ABSOLUTELY you from thinking that the "wisdom of this age" (an earthly wisdom) can be the same archontic wisdom.
  • Do you the math:
    • 1) the wisdom of this age is a human wisdom
    • 2) the wisdom of this age is not an archontic wisdom
    • 3) therefore: the wisdom "of the archontes of this age" is a not-human wisdom -----> the archontes are demons.
User avatar
Giuseppe
Posts: 15335
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Re: Jesus from Outer Space

Post by Giuseppe »

WARNING: if you (Bernard or Ben Or GDon or DavidMartin) will reply by saying that the Roman CIA, the Roman FBI, the Roman KGB or the Roman Mossad could know things about Jesus that were unknown to the stupid hoi polloi, then I will call you all: fool apologists.
User avatar
Giuseppe
Posts: 15335
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Re: Jesus from Outer Space

Post by Giuseppe »


οὐδέ (from Homer down), a neg. disjunctive conjunction, compounded of οὐ and δέ, and therefore properly, equivalent to but not; generally, however, its oppositive force being lost, it serves to continue a negation. (On the elision of ἐ when the next word begins with a vowel (observed by Tdf. in eight instances, neglected in fifty-eight), see Tdf. Proleg., p. 96; cf. WHs Appendix, p. 146; Winers Grammar, § 5, 1 a.; Buttmann, p. 10f) It signifies:
1. and not, continuing a negation, yet differently from οὔτε; for the latter connects parts or members of the same thing, since τέ is adjunctive like the Latinque; but οὐδέ places side by side things that are equal and mutually exclude each other

https://biblehub.com/greek/3761.htm
User avatar
GakuseiDon
Posts: 2564
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Jesus from Outer Space

Post by GakuseiDon »

Ben C. Smith wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:54 pmGiven your previous pointing out of the possible connection to Psalm 2.1, GDon, I thought you might be interested in the following possible parallels, too, the first of which (from Baruch) is found explicitly in a wisdom context, and all of which offer the same "where is"/"where are" rhetorical structure as Paul has:
Thanks Ben, as always!
User avatar
GakuseiDon
Posts: 2564
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Jesus from Outer Space

Post by GakuseiDon »

Bernard Muller wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:32 pmPaul had no cosmic meaning for the archontes in 1 Co 2:6-8.
I agree personally, but smarter 'historicist' scholars than me have thought that Paul did have that in mind, so I think it needs to be considered.
Bernard Muller wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:32 pmDid you follow my debate with Giuseppe where I exposed his so-called evidence as not existing and sometimes just possibilities?
To be fair to Giuseppe, couching things in terms of possibilities is to his credit. I don't like saying that, because well... it's darn Giuseppe. :silenced:
Bernard Muller wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:32 pm
On the other hand, both seem to be consistent with rulers being earthly ones.
Certainly the author of Acts did not have any problem about having archontes as earthly human ruler.
gLuke, gMatthew, gJohn and other NT texts also have archontes as human rulers. And in these texts, demons of the "devil one", Satan or Be-el'zebul are never said to be Archontes.
My thinking is: Satan is seen as the "god of this world". If (human) rulers have been placed here by God, then Satan may also have his rulers here. They may well be 'demon' rulers, but they would be rulers of humans. For example, Origen thought that the ruler of Tyre in the OT was a supernatural person who was the ruler of the humans of Tyre.

Either way: if rulers crucified Jesus, then I doubt that people thought that the rulers did it themselves. The rulers had their subordinates do it. Who are the subordinates of 'demon' rulers? It seems to me it is most likely to be humans. Giuseppe keeps slipping between "Ruler Satan and his subordinate demons" and "Ruler demons and their subordinates(?)" But "rulers of this age" is plural, so it doesn't appear to be the former one.

But given Ps 2 and going with the idea that the OT was mined for 'information' about Jesus, then Paul having in mind human rulers seems consistent with that trend.
User avatar
Giuseppe
Posts: 15335
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Re: Jesus from Outer Space

Post by Giuseppe »

GakuseiDon wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:37 am
My thinking is: Satan is seen as the "god of this world".
Paul talks about archontes "of this age", not of "this world" in 1 Cor 2:6-8, sorry.
GakuseiDon wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:37 am
But given Ps 2 and going with the idea that the OT was mined for 'information' about Jesus, then Paul having in mind human rulers seems consistent with that trend.
you and Ben want to ignore too much easily the fact that in the eyes of early Christians who read Ps 2 behind 'archontes' demons are meant and not humans.

But especially, you and Ben appear to ignore my post above, where I prove that Paul means demons and only demons behind "archontes of this age".

This is a real conspiracy of silence! :popcorn:
User avatar
Giuseppe
Posts: 15335
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Re: Jesus from Outer Space

Post by Giuseppe »

GakuseiDon wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:37 am
Either way: if rulers crucified Jesus, then I doubt that people thought that the rulers did it themselves. The rulers had their subordinates do it.
the same "rulers" seized the celestial Adam, too, according to this text of Nag Hammadi:
Then, when the seven rulers came, they saw him and were greatly disturbed. They went up to him and seized him. And he (viz., the chief ruler) said to the breath within him, "Who are you? And whence did you come hither?" It answered and said, "I have come from the force of the man for the destruction of your work." When they heard, they glorified him, since he gave them respite from the fear and the anxiety in which they found themselves. Then they called that day "Rest", in as much as they had rested from toil. And when they saw that Adam could stand up, they were glad, and they took him and put him in Paradise. And they withdrew up to their heavens.

http://gnosis.org/naghamm/origin.html

Were their subordinates humans to do the dirty work in their place? I.e., the descendants of their same victim? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Post Reply