Page 3 of 6
Re: Categorizing and Cataloging the Radical Bible Hypotheses
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:32 pm
by Stephan Huller
Re: Categorizing and Cataloging the Radical Bible Hypotheses
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:32 pm
by Stephan Huller
Re: Categorizing and Cataloging the Radical Bible Hypotheses
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:33 pm
by Stephan Huller
Re: Categorizing and Cataloging the Radical Bible Hypotheses
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:34 pm
by Stephan Huller
Jesus was the product of an alien insemination of an earth woman -
http://ufodigest.com/article/could-jesu ... thly-woman
Re: Categorizing and Cataloging the Radical Bible Hypotheses
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 4:10 pm
by MrMacSon
I think you should lump these post-1,000
AD/CEextra-terrestrial 'theories' in one category. Not worth individual contention?
Re: Categorizing and Cataloging the Radical Bible Hypotheses
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:43 pm
by DCHindley
perseusomega9 wrote:Allegro's Magic Mushrooms
Mmmmmmmmmm ...

Re: Categorizing and Cataloging the Radical Bible Hypotheses
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:56 pm
by DCHindley
14 ? Jesus traveled to Kashmir
Hugh Schonfield promoted that one, but he was speaking in the name of the Ahmadiyya Movement, a sort of synthesis of Islam, Christianity and Judaism. "Jesus was buried in the city of Srinagar in Kashmir."
DCH
Re: Categorizing and Cataloging the Radical Bible Hypotheses
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:17 pm
by Leucius Charinus
Stephan Huller wrote:I am not trying to pass judgment here. just assemble a list for a possible project I am working on
That remains to be seen. Whenever have you ever refrained from passing judgement in the past?
Is this a new leaf or something?
Jean Hardouin (1646-1729):
This guy wrote at a time when the Pseudo-Isidore forgery mill of the 9th century was publically exposed. What did he expect? He was just joining the dots in his own era.
- Apart from the Latin scriptures—and six classical authors, all the writers of antiquity, profane or ecclesiastical, were forged by a group of writers in the thirteenth or fourteenth centuries. This group of forgers he never defined or discussed, but always referred to them generically as 'the impious crew', 'maudite cabale'.
Edwin Johnson's "Antiqua Mater: A Study of Christian Origins" (1890):
The "unknown monk" Eusebius is "simply a theological romancer, and only in that sense can he be called an historian at all".
Joseph Whelas's "Forgery in Christianity (1930): "Forgery, forgery, forgery, forgery and ..... more forgery"
Dr. R. W. Bernard's Apollonius of Tyana the Nazarene (1964): Constantine swapped the worship of Apollonius with the worship of Jesus"
Hermann Detering's "THE FALSIFIED PAUL - Early Christianity in the Twilight" (1995): Is Paul real?
PRF. Fernando Conde Torrens' "Simon Opera Magna" (2005) [nb: SPANISH] - the entire four books of the NT are late fabrications of Eusebius of Cesarea
IDK.
Re: Categorizing and Cataloging the Radical Bible Hypotheses
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:03 pm
by Stephan Huller
Thank you Pete. I am looking for living representatives of any theories (even if they might ultimately be associated with someone from the past). Working on something big ...
Re: Categorizing and Cataloging the Radical Bible Hypotheses
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:06 pm
by Stephan Huller
There was a Lebanese professor who argued that Israel was really in Arabia -
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 80,5198751